ergi

Politics and art
Reclaiming the Latina Tag
Español, SÍ

Whenever I start feeling too arrogant about myself, I always make a trip to America. The immigration guys kick the star out of stardom. They always ask me how tall I am and I always lie and say 5 feet 10 inches. Next time, I am going to get more adventurous. If they ask me ‘what color are you?’ I am going to say white.

Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan on being detained at the U.S. Airport—twice. (Once, he was detained while promoting a film called “My Name is Khan” which was ironically about a person with the last name Khan suffering from repeated racial profiling.)

Multiple actors and other prominent individuals in the film industry with the last name “Khan” have been detained when entering the country. Irrfan Khan (The Life of Pi, Slumdog Millionaire, Spider-man) described the three times he was stopped—while on the way to receive honors for his roles in films such as The Namesake—as “humiliating.” Actor Aamir Khan was stopped and stripped searched in 2002. Director Kabir Khan, was reportedly detained at least three times in 2008 while filming in the United States. The New York Times ended up remarking on The Dangers of Fying While Khan

This much is clear:

  • Despite being an incredibly common surname, in the United States, Khan is a racialized last name and those who carry it suffer from additional, insulting, stigma and scrutiny.
  • There is no shortage of talented actors of South Asian descent whether from within the United States, from the UK, or Bollywood—and many of them even have the last name of Khan.
  • With Star Trek Into Darkness the name “Khan” is once again stigmatized as antagonistic, but the actors named Khan, the Khans of the world, and those who look like Khans once again have no voice about how they are represented in American media.

If you’re an award winning actor named Khan, you will still get stopped and humiliated at the airport. When that rare character in American media finally shows up sharing your name, he will be played by a white British man. That actor will wear your name for one movie and sneer and strut to great critical acclaim. You will wear your racialized name, your skin color, and hope you don’t get detained another time.

(via racebending)

(Source: rt.com, via likestepsonthemoon)

I don’t even give a shit that this is a spoiler for Star Trek, go fuck yourself

science-officer-spock:

teal-deer:

I have a longer rant about this, but I’m pissed as everloving fuck that Benedict Cumberbatch is, indeed, playing Khan Noonian Singh.

You can argue till you’re blue in the face that well, Ricardo Montalban wasn’t Indian, and he was of European descent and therefore white, but let me tell you, Montalban in the US was not white-passing and would have been parsed as Mexican. While that’s still not Indian, he’s still at least Not A White Guy. Montalban also founded the Nostoros Foundation, an organization to advocate for Latinos in the film industry and help them continue to get roles. 

Furthermore, Khan Noonian Singh, while a villain, is still one of the most prominent desi characters in American cinema. He’s iconic. And he’s not some withering racist stereotype either; he’s cunning, clever, brilliant, and dangerous. Nothing is EVER made of his race, we only know that he’s probably desi because of his name and appearance; the bigger point is that he’s been genetically engineered to be a perfect human. Let me repeat: in the 1960s, Gene Rodenberry decided that the perfect human was an Indian guy

Also look at this handsome face:

image

DAYMN. seriously go watch the TOS episode “Space Seed.” I’ll wait. 


So, while Benedict Cumberbatch is doubtless a fantastic actor, making his character into fucking KHAN NOONIEN SINGH for what to me reads as little more than a publicity stunt (“look! it’s khan in the second movie! just like how in the original movies it was khan in the second movie! :O”) is an insult to the original character, an insult to Gene Roddenberry, and an insult to Ricardo Montalban.

And it’s not as though there aren’t fantastic desi actors who could have portrayed the character. Need I remind you all that India has one of the largest film industries in the WORLD? Why not cast Shahrukh Khan? If you insist on an American, there’s always Sendhil Ramamurthy. But no, we’re going to cast LITERALLY the most British man in existence. 

It is whitewashing at its most vile and heinous, and it’s yet more evidence that fundamentally, J.J. Abrams does not understand the Star Trek universe in the least. I will not be going to see this movie, and in fact I’ll be avoiding Abrams productions and anything Cumberbatch is in from now on (Yes, that means I won’t be going to see the Hobbit, despite having wanted a Hobbit movie since I was a small child). 

i loved your post about Khan, and I absolutely agree with what you said. Not only do I feel anger about the whole casting but also sadness because there’s people out there, who claim to be fans, that are okay with the casting. Now, I don’t want to be thought of as those “elitist star trek fans” who say “oh you’re not a real fan if you like the reboots, or if you’ve only seen one series or movie” No, this isn’t what this is about. I believe that if you love Star Trek then you are a fan, but I also believe that you should know what Star Trek actually means and what it represents. The point of the show, to quote Gene Roddenberry is “Star Trek was an attempt to say that humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate, but take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in life forms” That is what Star Trek is about, it isn’t about stupid stereotypes, relentless action or the hotness of actors in any story. This show, the whole franchise, was to show you that there will be hope, friendships, love and acceptance. To a lot of people it isn’t just a show or a movie, it’s something important, something that picked them up when nothing could and something that made them feel like they belonged. The fan base is broad, and for a lot of us, it shows us in some way. The reason people are completely upset about the casting for Khan is because it’s just the same garbage and mistreatment that people have put up for years, not just in show business but in real life. Star Trek fans have come from all over the world and when we see people like us on screen, we feel less alone and like we’re just as important as anyone else because we are but it’s not always often that films or programs highlight this. To understand why it’s a huge deal you’d have to fathom how awful it is to feel like a second class citizen in your life, or to see it happen to someone you know. What Star Trek did was tell you “hey it’s alright to be yourself, you’ll be okay, you have a place with us” 

A lot of people will argue that only the acting matters, that Khan was engineered and he can look like anything, that Ricardo himself  wasn’t Indian, and some people even think he was white; all of that is not the point and you are missing the big picture. Khan and all the other people who were not white or appeared white on the show made a HUGE difference because they weren’t suppose to be there according to the politics in those years, Gene Roddenberry had to fight and take jabs from those that would try to get rid of what he wanted. He wanted to show the world that equality could be achieved, that what was then was not okay, that we’re all one. Granted that even back then there was whitewashing, and believe me, the fans are not okay with it, at the time it was the only way more diversity could be shown sadly enough, and throughout all those years, until now, it’s terrible that these people in charge believe that they can still stop the change that Gene had in mind. Things were not perfect at all but they tried and now at a new era it’s so disheartening to see it still happening and people defending it. It’s incredibly insulting, to those of us who are not white - or even to those who are white but believe in equality! it’s just saying “We have money, we want more money and we don’t give a damn about what Star Trek means to you. We will use a white actor because he’s well known and will bring us more money. We do not care how it makes you feel” 

People who accept this change of Khan don’t know what it’s like to feel inferior, to feel like an outcast, or uncomfortable to be in your own skin - we do and that’s why it’s important to us because it’s basically sending us to the back again, only those with money and white skin can be in power - the exact opposite that Khan was about, the opposite message of what the creator of Star Trek desired. And if you get upset by this, only because you love Benedict Cumberbatch, then you should be smart enough to realise how pitiful that is. No one wants to attack his looks or his acting skills, it is beyond him. I urge those who believe that to see it through a logical point of view instead of a vain one.

I would also like to throw in that Montalban came to the U.S. during a time when restaurants had signs like “No dogs or Mexicans allowed”.

Do you understand this? Montalban was cast in a prominent role for a popular TV show during a time in which non-Whites were (more) overtly discriminated against. So I really don’t have time for the tears when we’ve very clearly regressed and nay-sayers are giving every excuse in the book as to why the nu!casting isn’t horrendous and upsetting.

You love Cumberbatch? Great, I’m happy for you. This was not the role for him and you should be upset that your fave is being used to uphold the status quo

Countdown To Darkness #4

(Source: cruelmagic, via acceber74)

goddessofcheese:

feathereddinosaur:

Star Trek Magazine #32 understands how to canon

image

Star Trek Ongoing #18
Uhura asks Spock out

pommerose:

Uhura and Spock doing space adventures!

pommerose:

Uhura and Spock doing space adventures!

Star Trek fanart by ~SakariSingh
In Space by *oxboxer 
Pretty sure I am dying from how cute this is

In Space by *oxboxer 

Pretty sure I am dying from how cute this is

Reboot!Uhura and Masculinized Female Heroes

concentratedridiculousness:

annabelleisapeach:

So it’s taken me a long time to pinpoint exactly why I dislike Reboot!Uhura, and it doesn’t help that discussions about the character are so often framed with arguments about race or her sexualization as a female character.  But I have finally found the circumstances under which I am totally prepared to completely allow Zoe Saldana’s Uhura into my heart: if, as her character arc continues over the next two movies, she starts to become as warm and feminine as Nichelle Nichol’s Uhura, then I will completely accept her interpretation and love that character.

Read More

Holy crap, thank you.  This is exactly how I feel about this issue, but I’ve been unable to articulate it (see: disastrous attempt to explain discomfort with Reboot!Uhura and the Spock/Uhura romance, which simply led to me looking like a raging dick trying to wage a ship war).  Canon!Uhura is all about grace under pressure, kindness and gentleness with incredibly strong foundations - silk over steel.  It makes me sad to see that in the Reboot all the silk’s been shredded away.  Where’s the Uhura who sings and smiles and laughs, who’s warm and compassionate and caring while taking absolutely no shit (largely because nobody’s stupid enough to try and give her any)? 

I don’t have a problem with the steel-only female character, I’m just sad that we seem to feel the need to make every female character fit that mold as a call-word for “strength” - ultimately it’s just a clever way to avoid actual character development.  If she’s shoving the menfolk around and barking orders, writers can mostly ignore the female character because they’ve already covered their asses by making her “strong” in shorthand.

As stated in this piece (and as I’ve said before), I see no reason why we can’t have our Uhura back as the franchise continues - we’ve only seen her through Jim’s eyes while they’re on antagonistic terms, with very brief flashes from a friendlier perspective in Spock (I’m not going to attempt to get into that dynamic here, because I really don’t want it to seem like I’m only in this for the shipping).  And those flashes seem promising!  That lift sequence after Amanda’s death (fridging? I really hadn’t thought of it that way, but now that you mention it…) was 100% classic Uhura.  Let’s let her have the good times too, shall we?

Both critiques here are hastily and poorly made. 
You talk about nu!Uhura lacking the grace of her TOS counterpart—did we watch the same movie? She gracefully, and repeatedly, turns down infamous ladies’ man James Kirk, despite his brazen and unwanted pick up techniques. She calmly and logically tells Spock why she deserves being put on the Federation’s flagship. Her knowledge and expertise allow her to translate a message her direct superior couldn’t—a message that ends up being critical in connecting the dots wrt the attack on Vulcan. She shows incredible compassion and understanding for Spock; both in that she understands he is experiencing terrible grief and in that he is Vulcan and will want to keep a facade of stoicism and emotional control so she does not pressure him.

I also don’t understand the critique of the possibility of her “barking” orders or “shoving men around”—as Chief Communications Officer she is fourth in command. She’s not some green ensign who doesn’t know her place or is sitting around antagonizing “the menfolk” because that’s the only way to write a Strong Female Character™. She is fully within her rights to give orders, I would even say it’s expected.

Another thing to remember when complaining about nu!Uhura’s characterization is that the crux of STXI took place over what was 24 hours. Twenty-four hours of death-defying constant action, live or die. To complain that she isn’t singing or dancing or making jokes in the recreation lounge isn’t really pertinent and to compare STXI’s characterization of her to TOS Uhura who had ninety episodes (and six movies) and almost five years of time to develop is laughable.

Lastly, and most importantly imo, is that the majority of people who complain about nu!Uhura’s characterization and wishing for the TOS Uhura are literally asking for a character that got very little screen time, was not quite as critical a character (in the TV series) and who was written to fit the sensibilities of an America that did not recognize Black people as individuals deserving of rights. I mean, you’re free to dislike nu!Uhura for whatever reason but, to be frank, wishing for her to be more like the Uhura written before the Civil Rights Act was passed is really gross and more indicative of simply hating that she dare be with one of the Golden Boys of the Enterprise than having a legitimate complaint on the way her character is written.

I mean you are literally saying an Uhura who dances and sings naked to distract some guards and never really leaves the Enterprise in TOS proper:
Is superior to an Uhura who actually gets explored and gets in on prime time screen action:

And that’s incredibly problematic